Sunday, December 4, 2011

Reverse Osmosis Purifier Vs Ionization? Healthy Water Or Waste of Money


!±8± Reverse Osmosis Purifier Vs Ionization? Healthy Water Or Waste of Money

If drinking water safety is of paramount importance to you then recent headlines such as "Drugs Found In Drinking Water" and "EPA Won't Remove Rocket Fuel From Drinking Water" must have been deeply troubling to you. With a myriad of water filtration systems on the market designed to rid your drinking water of dangerous contaminants, it cannot be easy to choose a suitable filter.

Of the many choices of water filtration devices, two that have been the subject of  much public debate is reverse osmosis purifier vs ionization. Actually to compare the two is sort of unfair. Reverse osmosis water filters are used to rid tap water of contaminants whereas water ionizers are suppose to make your drinking water alkaline which supposedly has beneficial health properties.

Essentially, people who are looking to rid contaminants from their tap water won't buy an ionizer; they would more likely buy a reverse osmosis filter. So the question of reverse osmosis purifier vs ionization really boils down to which water is the healthiest choice.

One school of thought is that ionized water is healthier because it is less acidic that reverse osmosis treated water. The incidence of cancer and other diseases is said to higher in an acidic body. Drinking ionized water regularly neutralizes free radicals making disease less likely.

There are many in the scientific community that thinks that water ionizers are a waste of money, not only because some don't work as they are supposed to but also because the science behind them is faulty. Not to mention the fact that they can be very expensive. Others however, swear by them.

Another school of thought is that reverse osmosis treated water removes a lot of the contaminants from our tap water, contaminants that are of an immediate concern. These contaminants can over time can badly affect our health, leading to diseases such as cancer, Alzheimer's and problems of the reproductive system.

Experts who subscribe to this school of thought believe that with a proper diet, exercise and supplementation, there is no need to drink ionized water. But, there is a need to drink water that is free from contaminants.

So reverse osmosis purifier vs ionization, which would you choose? It is really down to your priorities and indeed your pocket.

If drinking water safety is of a more serious concern to you, get a reverse osmosis purifier or any of the other filtration units on the market. However, if you feel that the alkalinity of your tap water is of greater importance to your health, you may want to try a water ionizer.


Reverse Osmosis Purifier Vs Ionization? Healthy Water Or Waste of Money

Best Rated Elliptical Machines Order Now




No comments:

Post a Comment


Twitter Facebook Flickr RSS



Français Deutsch Italiano Português
Español 日本語 한국의 中国简体。